The IRS urges businesses to review ERC claims for 7 common red flags

February 26, 2024 | by RSM US LLP

The Employee Retention Credit (ERC) provided a refundable employment tax credit for eligible employers experiencing economic hardship, generally for wages paid between March 13, 2020 through Sept. 30, 2021. While the program provided necessary economic relief for employers experiencing financial hardship related to COVID-19, the Service was eventually inundated with claims by applicants that were either not eligible for relief or claimed an excessive amount of ERC. Many applicants were misled into claiming ERC because of aggressive marketing by third party promoters.

The Service is responding to the influx of dubious claims by aggressively targeting ERC claims for audit, placing a moratorium on the processing of new claims and launching criminal investigations on promoters and businesses associated with improper claims. 

The Service recently advised businesses to revisit their eligibility before March 22, 2024. The more beneficial ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program remains open only until March 22, 2024 for taxpayers that previously claimed and received the ERC but have now determined they were ineligible for some or all quarters. The voluntary disclosure program gives taxpayers an opportunity to repay only 80% of the erroneous ERC received and avoid certain penalties and interest while providing protection against future audit of the employment tax returns at issue. 

An employer may enter the ERC Withdrawal Program to avoid potential penalties and interest if the ERC refund has not yet been paid by the IRS but the employer now believes it is ineligible (or partially ineligible). An employer may only withdraw a claim if it has not been selected for an IRS examination. The ERC withdrawal program continues to be effective even after March 22, 2024.

With the March 22, 2024 deadline quickly approaching, the Service encourages employers to carefully review their ERC claims while there is still time to voluntarily disclose errors under the most beneficial program. 

The agency also alerted employers of seven common signs that a claim may be incorrect:

  1. Too many quarters being claimed.  It is uncommon for a taxpayer to qualify for ERC for all quarters that the credit was available. Employers are urged to carefully review their eligibility for each quarter, especially if they are asserting eligibility under the government orders test rather than the gross receipts test. Even employers satisfying the gross receipts test may need to examine eligibility if they are a large employer who must establish wages claimed for ERC were paid for the nonperformance of service.
  2. Government orders that do not qualify. To claim the ERC under the government order test,
    1. The government orders impacting the employer’s operations must have been in effect and the operations must have been fully or partially suspended because of the government order during the period for which they are claiming the credit,
    2. The government order must be due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and
    3. The order must be a government order, as opposed to guidance, a recommendation or statement.
  3. Too many employees and wrong calculations.  Employers need to meet certain rules for wages to be considered qualified wages, depending on the tax period. As the law changed throughout 2020 and 2021, the credit is likely to be overclaimed if the same credit amount is used across multiple tax periods for each employee. In addition, large eligible employers must follow a set of additional rules when calculating eligible wages that can be complex. 
  4. Business citing supply chain issues. A supply chain disruption alone does not qualify an employer for ERC. Employers need to carefully review the rules on supply chain issues to ensure eligibility.
  5. Business claiming ERC for too much of a tax period. Businesses should review their claim for overstated qualifying wages as it is uncommon to qualify for ERC for the entire calendar quarter if their business operations were suspended due to a government order during only a portion of a calendar quarter.
  6. Business did not pay wages or did not exist during eligibility period. Employers can only claim ERC for tax periods in which they were in existence and paid wages to employees. Businesses should confirm they only submitted claims for tax periods for which they can verify that employees were paid and the business was ongoing.
  7. ERC promoter claims there is nothing to lose.  Businesses that were told applying for the ERC presented no risk should carefully review their claims for eligibility. Incorrect ERC claims risk repayment, penalties, interest, and audit.

If an employer determines their claim was ineligible or partially ineligible, they should consult with a tax professional about taking advantage of the ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program or the ERC Withdrawal Program as soon as possible.

Let’s Talk!

Call us at (209) 577-4800 or fill out the form below and we’ll contact you to discuss your specific situation.

  • Should be Empty:
  • Topic Name:

This article was written by Alina Solodchikova, Karen Field , Marissa Lenius, Tiffany Mosely and originally appeared on 2024-02-26. Reprinted with permission from RSM US LLP.
© 2024 RSM US LLP. All rights reserved. https://rsmus.com/insights/tax-alerts/2024/irs-urges-businesses-to-review-erc-claims.html

RSM US LLP is a limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent assurance, tax and consulting firms. The member firms of RSM International collaborate to provide services to global clients, but are separate and distinct legal entities that cannot obligate each other. Each member firm is responsible only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of any other party. Visit rsmus.com/about for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM US LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM US LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

Beneficial Ownership Information – New Report Requirements

February 07, 2024 | by Atherton & Associates, LLP

 

New Beneficial Ownership Information Report Requirements

 

As part of the federal government’s anti-money laundering and anti-tax evasion efforts, they are attempting to look beyond shell companies that are set up to hide money. Under the Corporate Transparency Act, corporations, limited liability companies (LLCs), limited partnerships, and other entities that file formation papers with a state’s Secretary of State’s office (or similar government agency) are required to file a Beneficial Ownership Information Report (BOI) with the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). This report provides specified information regarding the entity’s “beneficial owners.”

Beneficial owners are broadly defined and involve owners who directly or indirectly own more than 25% of the entity’s ownership interests or exercise substantial control over the reporting company (even if they do not have an actual ownership interest). While this may seem to only impact a few significant owners, it can encompass many senior officers of the business as well as those individuals who participate in any significant business decisions (e.g., board members). Given the severity of the fines, it may be safer to err on the side of over-inclusion rather than under-inclusion.

For entities formed after 2023, information must be provided about the company applicants (the person who files the formation/registration papers and the person primarily responsible for directing or controlling the filing of the documents). The types of information required (and kept current) for these beneficial owners include the owner’s legal name, residential address, date of birth, and unique identifier number from a nonexpired passport, driver’s license, or state identification card. The entity will also need to provide an image of any of these forms of documentation to FinCEN for all beneficial owners.

There are various company types that are exempt from this filing. They include: 

  • Securities reporting issuer
  • Governmental authority
  • Bank
  • Credit Union
  • Money services business
  • Depository institution holding company
  • Broker or dealer in securities
  • Securities exchange or clearing agency
  • Other Exchange Act registered entity
  • Venture capital fund adviser
  • Investment company or investment adviser
  • Insurance company
  • State-licensed insurance producer
  • Commodity Exchange Act registered entity
  • Accounting firm
  • Public utility
  • Financial market utility
  • Pooled investment vehicle
  • Tax-exempt entity
  • Entity assisting a tax-exempt entity
  • Subsidiary of certain exempt entities
  • Inactive entity

 

If your entity does not fall into one of the categories above, you may still be exempt if your entity is considered a “large operating company.” The IRS defines a large operating company as an entity:

  • With 20 full-time U.S. employees. A full-time employee is an employee who is employed an average of at least 30 hours per week. Employer aggregation rules do not apply
  •  With a U.S. physical office; and
  • That filed a federal income tax return in the prior year with more than $5 million in US gross receipts or sales (determined on a consolidated basis for taxpayers filing consolidated returns). Receipts or sales from outside the U.S. are excluded in determining the $5 million threshold.

All three of the rules above must apply to you at all times in order to be exempt from filing. So, if your employee count falls under twenty, you are required to report.

Entities in existence prior to January 1, 2024, have until January 1, 2025, to file these reports. However, entities formed in 2024 will have 90 days from the entity’s formation/registration to file these reports. The deadline changes to within 30 days of formation after 2024. If any of the reported information changes or a beneficial ownership interest is sold or transferred, the entity must report this information within 30 days of the change or face the potential of having the penalties described above imposed. Changes include reporting a beneficial owner’s change of address or name, a new passport number when a passport is replaced or renewed or providing a copy of a renewed driver’s license.

The BOI report must be completed electronically through the FINCEN’s secure filing system called “BOSS,” (Beneficial Ownership Secure System). 

Unfortunately, we understand that this will impose burdensome reporting requirements on most businesses, but the willful failure to report information and timely update any changed information can result in significant fines of up to $500 per day until the violation is remedied, or if criminal charges are brought, fines of up to $10,000 and/or two years imprisonment. These penalties can be imposed against the beneficial owner, the entity, and/or the person completing the report.

While we can do our best to our your questions directly, we highly recommend you visit the following website, https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/BOI_Informational_Brochure_508C.pdf for more information or https://www.fincen.gov/boi-faqs for FAQs to answer your questions. The registration can be found at https://www.fincen.gov/boi.

We hope that this information is helpful. Due to the many requirements of this new law, our firm is unable to fill out this information for you. Therefore, this is something that you must complete on your own. Please be sure to review all requirements and ensure that you complete the BOI report in a timely manner.

 

Sincerely,

Atherton & Associates, LLP

Let’s Talk!

Call us at (209) 577-4800 or fill out the form below and we’ll contact you to discuss your specific situation.

  • Should be Empty:
  • Topic Name:

California Charitable Organization Audit Requirements

February 06, 2024 | by Atherton & Associates, LLP

Did you know that charitable organizations with gross revenues of $2 million or more must have audited financial statements prepared by an independent CPA? The $2 million threshold excludes grants received from governmental entities.  Understanding the intricate details of audit requirements for nonprofit organizations is crucial to maintain transparency and uphold financial integrity. At Atherton & Associates, we’re committed to helping nonprofits navigate these complexities and ensure compliance with laws and regulations like the Nonprofit Integrity Act of 2004. If your organization falls within the $2 million revenue category excluding governmental grants, it’s essential to have your financial statements audited by an independent CPA. For any questions or if you’d like to discuss the audit requirements and how they apply to your organization, don’t hesitate to reach out to our office. Our expert advisors are always here to assist you. Please call us at 209-577-4800.

Nonprofit Integrity Act of 2004

California Charity Laws & Regulations

National Council of Nonprofits / California Audit Requirements

Let’s Talk!

Call us at (209) 577-4800 or fill out the form below and we’ll contact you to discuss your specific situation.

  • Should be Empty:
  • Topic Name: